National Grid - Completion of Performance Review Cycle

Library

National Grid - Delivery Performance for levels 6 -8

National Grid is now coming to the end of its performance review cycle; the last date for reviews to be held should be 9 May 2016. As announced by the company earlier this week the RPI figure for March 2016 was 1.6%.



 

It is therefore a pertinent time to remind members of the appeals process that was agreed as part of the implementation of performance pay for levels 6 – 8.  Prospect recognises that performance reviews may not be conducted as we would like in all cases and therefore it is important to have an appeal process to address any fundamental disagreements. 

 

The first appeal stage is to your reviewer’s manager and must be submitted on the form, which is available on National Grid’s internet, no later than Friday 27 May 2016.  You will need to provide evidence of performance success to support your appeal.  The only possible ground for appeal is a disagreement regarding performance rating that you have been given.  First stage appeals should be resolved by Friday 10 June 2016. 

 

If the disagreement cannot be resolved with your reviewer’s manager, the second stage of the appeal process is to a joint review panel of the National Grid Staff Forum, comprising 2 managers and 2 trade union representatives.  The deadline for stage 2 appeals is Tuesday 14 June 2016 and again a form to submit your appeal is on the company intranet.  The panel will make a recommendation to your second line manager who will make the final decision.

 

Prospect’s most recent survey of members suggested that there remains a healthy amount of scepticism around the performance review process and therefore the Branch Executive Committee recommends that if you are unhappy with your performance rating and you have strong evidence to support your case that you do consider submitting an appeal.  In 2015 success at both stage and stage 2 was around 40% and our representatives who were involved in the stage 2 panel reported that it was a fair and consistent process.

 

It is worth reminding you that objectives should be SMART (Specific Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time bound) so please think about those principles in relation to your own review.  You should also ensure that your performance is measured against circumstances within your control and that evidence is provided to support your arguments.

 

If for any reason your manager has not scheduled a review meeting with you I would strongly advise that you raise it with them in the first instance, it is important that you are provided with an opportunity to discuss your performance rating and raise any issues you may have.

 

If you need further advice about the performance review process or submitting an appeal please discuss this with your local Prospect representative in the first instance.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Philippa Childs

National Secretary